Post 4
THESIS RESEARCH AND WRITING/ METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
Lecture on Review of Literature
I. Opening Comments -
This assignment is to get some authoritative information into your presentation. Learners will gain more if you speak from research, not opinion. For that reason, you will need to find recent (published in the last 5 years) sources which you can quote. It will take some time, but it will reap great benefits.
Today's material should guide you in how to select your sources AND how to use them. Be sure and click on any links found in the assignment and read the material found on those sites. Include comments on those sites as well as this when you write your observations in the comment box at the end of this assigment.
II. Review of Assignment
For the last lesson you were to write a thesis statement. You should review what you wrote to see if it is both gripping and substantive. Readers should be able to view it and understand what your entire presentation is going to be about AND want to listen to every word you are going to say!
III. New Material on the Purpose of Study-
a. Introduction- From online writing handbook for Ole Miss: Doctoral and Masters students may find it helpful to begin writing a review of literature as soon as they enter graduate school. Building a comprehensive annotated bibliography may save many hours of work when dissertation time arrives. (http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/writing_center/grlitreview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
b. Definition-
1. A review of literature in a scholarly paper is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and researchers have written on a topic, organized according to a guiding concept such as a research objective, thesis, or the problem/issue to be addressed. (http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/writing_center/grlitreview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
2. A review may be a self-contained unit -- an end in itself -- or a preface to and rationale for engaging in primary research. A review is a required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertations. (http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html, accessed 2/7/05)
3. Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources (e.g. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work. The purpose is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic. (http://library.ucsc.edu/ref/howto/literaturereview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
c. Purpose-
1. Generally, the purpose of a review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles. (http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html, accessed 2/7/05)
2. Demonstrate your intellectual ability to recognize relevant information.Demonstrate your ability to synthesize and evaluate the literature according to the guiding concept you have determined for yourself. (http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/writing_center/grlitreview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
3. A literature review may constitute an essential chapter of a thesis or dissertation, or may be a self-contained review of writings on a subject. In either case, its purpose is to:
a. Place each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review
b. Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration
c. Identify new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in, previous research
d. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies
e. Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort
f. Point the way forward for further research
g. Place one's original work (in the case of theses or dissertations) in the context of existing literature (http://library.ucsc.edu/ref/howto/literaturereview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
d. Process- Similar to primary research, development of the literature review requires four stages:
1. Problem formulation—which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues?
2. Literature search—finding materials relevant to the subject being explored
3. Data evaluation—determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic
4. Analysis and interpretation—discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature (http://library.ucsc.edu/ref/howto/literaturereview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
e. Format –
1. The format of a review of literature may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment. (http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html, accessed 2/7/05)
2. Literature reviews should comprise the following elements:
a. An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review
b. Division of works under review into categories (e.g. those in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses entirely)
c. Explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others
d. Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research (http://library.ucsc.edu/ref/howto/literaturereview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
f. Things to consider:
1. Resources discussed in the review should be scholarly in nature. Scholarly journals generally have a sober, serious look, and contain many graphs and charts (few glossy pages or exciting pictures). Scholarly journals always cite their sources in the form of footnotes or bibliographies. Authors are scholars in the field or someone who has done research in the field. Scholarly language is that of the discipline covered and assumes some scholarly background on the part of the reader. The main purpose of the review of literature is to report on original research or experimentation in order to make such information available to the rest of the scholarly world. (http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/writing_center/grlitreview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
2. Provenance—What are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence (e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)?
3. Objectivity—Is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
4. Persuasiveness—Which of the author's theses are most/least convincing?
5. Value—Are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? (http://library.ucsc.edu/ref/howto/literaturereview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
6. Show off your research skills:
a. Information seeking: your ability to scan the literature efficiently using manual or computerized methods to identify a set of potentially useful articles and books.
b. Critical appraisal: your ability to apply principles of analysis to identify those studies which are unbiased and valid. (http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/writing_center/grlitreview.html, accessed 2/7/05)
IV. Assignment-
A. Write your Review of Literature.
1. (5 Books)
2. Send this part of your assignment to the instructor in an e-mail. Use wmartin@abcnash.edu.
B. Write an evaluation of the assignement on the class website in the comment section